Solvix International provides construction contract drafting and contract review services for clients who need clearer risk allocation, stronger commercial protection, and better contract administration mechanisms before procurement, award, or major negotiation milestones. We work across FIDIC, NEC, and bespoke agreements to test whether the contract language supports the project strategy, reflects practical delivery realities, and reduces exposure to avoidable claims and disputes.
Our role may involve drafting from first principles, reviewing employer-issued terms, commenting on amendments proposed by the other party, or strengthening specific clauses where the existing language is unclear, incomplete, or commercially unbalanced.
Draft or review contract terms so that risk allocation, time, payment, and change provisions match the project's delivery strategy.
Identify ambiguous, inconsistent, or impractical clauses before signature, when they can still be negotiated.
The service can be used to draft a new contract, review employer- or contractor-issued terms, prepare amendments to a standard form, or support negotiation of a draft before award.
Review General and Particular Conditions, allocation of employer and contractor risks, notice provisions, variations, delay events, claims, and dispute-board or arbitration pathways.
Provide comment matrices, fallback wording, and issue-by-issue negotiation positions for tender and post-award discussions.
Identify ambiguity, inconsistent definitions, impractical notice machinery, and provisions likely to trigger future entitlement conflict.
Many construction disputes can be traced back to unclear or unworkable contract wording. Reviewing the contract before signature reduces the number of issues that later need to be argued.
Drafting or review of conditions and amendments before the tender package is issued.
Review of employer terms for contractors and subcontractors preparing a tender.
Assessment of amendments to standard forms and their effect on risk allocation.
Check that subcontract terms are consistent with the main contract obligations.
Support for negotiating outstanding contract points with the other party.
Notes for project teams on how the agreed clauses should be operated.
Definitions, precedence clauses, and document hierarchy across conditions, appendices, specifications, and schedules.
Scope, design responsibility, temporary works obligations, interfaces, and responsibility boundaries between parties.
Programme obligations, milestone structure, float treatment, concurrency wording, and extension-of-time entitlement architecture.
Variations, instructed change, valuation rules, and the practical ability to capture scope growth or resequencing costs.
Payment procedures, certification cycles, withholding, set-off, retention, final account, and substantiation requirements.
Notice obligations, time-bars, conditions precedent, reservation-of-rights language, and claim submission mechanics.
Indemnities, liability caps, exclusions, insurance interfaces, suspension, termination, and post-termination rights.
Dispute-avoidance and dispute-resolution clauses, including negotiation steps, dispute boards, adjudication, mediation, arbitration, or court jurisdiction.
We do not treat contract review as a purely legal wording exercise detached from how projects are actually delivered. Our approach combines commercial awareness, claims experience, schedule and cost sensitivity, and practical construction administration insight so that the final contract is not only defensible on paper but workable during the life of the project.
We identify the project structure, stakeholders, risk profile, market conditions, and the role the contract must play in supporting successful delivery.
We assess the contract form, amendments, schedules, appendices, technical interfaces, and any precedent wording already in circulation.
We focus on the clauses most likely to affect entitlement, cash flow, programme performance, variation recovery, and dispute posture.
We highlight language that is internally inconsistent, too vague to administer effectively, or unfairly weighted in a way that may trigger negotiation or claims friction.
We provide improved wording, drafting alternatives, and issue summaries that help clients negotiate from a clear and commercially informed position.
Where needed, we explain how the revised contract should be administered so the project team understands the practical operation of the final terms.
The exact record set depends on whether Solvix is drafting a new contract or reviewing an existing one. We tailor the output to the decision that the client needs to make, whether that is bid/no-bid evaluation, negotiation strategy, award readiness, or internal governance sign-off.
No. Solvix supports standard forms such as FIDIC and NEC as well as heavily amended and fully bespoke contracts.
Yes. Better drafting often improves notice compliance, variation capture, payment clarity, and risk allocation, which directly reduces future claims exposure.
No. Solvix provides commercial and contractual advice focused on how the contract will operate on the project. Where formal legal advice is required, we work alongside the client's legal advisers.
At Solvix International, we specialize in delivering exceptional project management and consultancy services.
Loop in for the latest news and insights from Solvix International.
Local Expertise. Global Standards.
Our Dubai team combines deep local knowledge with international best practices to deliver exceptional results for every project.
We use essential cookies to run this site. With your permission we also use Google Analytics cookies to see which pages are useful and which lead to enquiries. Cookie Policy
